Scientific thinking
is the means by which one views the world from various perspectives (scientific
disciplines) to acquire new knowledge and increase understanding. Scientific
research is a systematic and, in many cases, a fairly rigorous process of analyzing
phenomena, asking questions, collecting data, and developing answers.
Scientific research is often defined by the scientific method, which
essentially describes the process by which scientific research is conducted.
There are many models that describe the scientific method, but it typically
consists of a few important steps:
Step 1: Observe what
is going on in the world around you.
Step 2: Ask
questions about what you observe (who, what, where, why, how).
Step 3: Create
models that help conceptualize your observations and questions.
Step 4: Test your
model for proper representation and prediction of the world you've observed.
The scientific
method is a continuous and iterative process because the world is always
changing and one simple model can never account for all possible variables or
for all influencing factors.
An important
activity that takes place within the scientific method is research to find out
what is already known about the world being observed. At the point in the
scientific method where questions are asked, the researcher begins to research
the literature to find out if anyone else has asked the same or similar
questions and what, if anything, was discovered. This research phase is often
referred to as the literature review and consists of activities to review
material across a spectrum of professionally written articles to personal blogs
related to the topic. So let's break down the literature review process.
Like the scientific
method, there are several models that describe how the literature review
process works, but it essentially consists of activities that help frame the
problem, collect research data, and identify patterns amongst the collected
research data. The literature review begins with the research question, and
from the research question, the primary topic or focus of the question is
derived. In the book, The literature review:
Six steps to success, Machi and McEvoy use the analogy of putting
together a puzzle to describe the literature review process.
Once assembled, the
puzzle displays a picture of something. Pictures might include images of
various things. In the case of the picture above, the picture includes images
of big rocks, clouds, trees, and water. Each image represents a concept. The
tree is a concept. The water is a concept. The rocks are concepts. A concept is
simply an idea that has definition and meaning. From the perspective of the
world around us, concepts represent shared ideas. We all see the same things in
the picture above, and we all define the images in the picture the same way.
In the literature
review puzzle, framing the problem consists of activities to identify the
topic, core concepts of the topic, and the boundaries (terms and ideas) of the
topic. We can think of the topic as the picture itself. Framing the problem is
a way to focus the lens of the camera, so we only get what we need in the
picture. The next step is collecting the
research data. Here we search everything from professional research articles to
personal blogs to discover what is already known about the topic and see what
questions have already been asked. We then take all of this data, and we find
the patterns in the literature. This helps identify the themes and the
consistent thinking and the relationships that exist across the breadth of the
literature. From here, the researcher continues with the scientific method.
More on the scientific method is subsequent posts.
References
Machi, L. A.;
McEvoy, B. T. (2016). The literature
review: Six steps to success (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin
Press.
Wow, great post.
ReplyDelete